I am thinking about the fairest way to split equity among co-founders and came up with an idea: What if you had all founders start at a very low equity stake (5%) equally. Those founders then had 1 year to prove themselves and at the end of the year, all contributions/performance was evaluated and a higher equity split was determined based on that year's performance.
This is, of course, assuming no investors or partners were onboarded during that time.
Is this dumb?
submitted by /u/captain_DA
[link] [comments]
Startups – Rapid Growth and Innovation is in Our Very Nature!